Skip to main content
SolarCalcWorks

Battery to Inverter Wire Size Calculator

The battery to inverter cable carries the highest current in the whole system, over the shortest distance, at the lowest voltage. That combination is why it is the run people most often get wrong, and why 2 % rather than 3 % is the standard voltage drop target here.

  • Highest-current circuit in the system
  • NEC ampacity plus 2 % drop target
  • 12 V · 24 V · 48 V banks
  • Termination and fusing guidance

Battery to Inverter Wire Size Calculator

Inputs2 % target
System voltage
Conductor material

2% of 24 V = 0.48 V of budget across the whole round trip.

Installation conditionsdefaults are code-safe

Already have wire? Check the drop on a size you own.

Conductor42.4 mm²

1AWG · Cu · 90 °C

Ampacity sets this size

Voltage drop alone would allow 4 AWG, but the conductor has to carry the current without overheating. That is a code minimum — you cannot trade it away, and shortening the run will not help.

Voltage drop
0.77%
0.18 V lost
At the load
23.82 V
from 24 V
Amps at terminals
130 A
needs 125 A
Heat in the wire
18 W
at 100 A
Calculation

1Maximum circuit current

100 A rated

No 690.8(A) multiplier applies outside PV source and output circuits.

2Test A — 125 % at the terminals

100 A × 1.25 = 125 A required
1 AWG @ 75 °C = 130 A ✓

Continuous loads need 125 % headroom, and NEC 110.14(C) caps the usable column at the lowest-rated termination. No derating applies to this test.

3Test B — derated ampacity

145 A @ 90 °C = 145 A
must be ≥ 100 A ✓

30 °C ambient falls in the 26–30 °C band of Table 310.15(B)(1).

4Test C — can a device protect it?

device needed = 125 A (NEC 240.6(A))
1 AWG may be protected at up to 150 A ✓

NEC 240.4(B) permits rounding up to the next standard rating; 240.4(D) then caps 14, 12 and 10 AWG regardless — except on PV circuit conductors, which 240.4(G) exempts. A conductor with adequate ampacity can still fail here.

5Voltage drop

2 × 6.0 ft × 100 A × 0.1540 Ω/kft ÷ 1000
= 0.18 V = 0.77% of 24 V

The run is doubled because current returns on the second conductor. Resistance from NEC Chapter 9, Table 8. Voltage drop is a design target, not a code requirement — NEC 210.19(A) Informational Note 4 recommends 3 % or less.

6The answer

Ampacity needs 1 AWG, protection coordination needs 1 AWG, and the 2.0% drop target needs 4 AWG. The conductor has to satisfy all three, so the answer is the largest: 1 AWG.

Reference 210.19(A)(1) · 310.15 · 706.30 · 110.14(C) · 240.4 · Ch.9 T.8 — NEC 2023. Sources and limitations.

Overcurrent protection125 A

Calculated minimum 125 A, rounded up to the 125 A standard rating in NEC 240.6(A).

NEC 210.20(A): the device rating must be at least 125 % of the continuous load. NEC 240.4(D) additionally caps the device on 14, 12 and 10 AWG conductors.

NextSize the fuse or breaker for this circuitA conductor is only protected once a device is sized to it.
Nearby sizes100 A · 6 ft
Conductor sizes compared by ampacity margin and voltage drop
SizeAmps spareDropVerdict
3 AWG-251.2%Under ampacity
2 AWG-101.0%Under ampacity
1 AWGpick50.8%Meets all
1/0 AWG250.6%Meets all
2/0 AWG500.5%Meets all
3/0 AWG750.4%Meets all

Amps spare is the margin on the tighter of the two NEC ampacity tests.

Start with the current, not the wattage

This calculator needs the inverter’s maximum continuous DC input current, which is not the same number as its AC output rating.

If the datasheet lists it, use that. Otherwise:

I(DC) = continuous AC watts ÷ inverter efficiency ÷ lowest battery voltage under load

Two details matter. Use efficiency, typically 0.88 to 0.94 — the inverter draws more DC power than it delivers as AC. And use the lowest battery voltage you expect under load, not the nominal label. A 24 V bank under a heavy draw sits nearer 23 V than 24 V, and that difference alone moves the current by about 4 %.

Worked: a 3000 W inverter at 90 % efficiency on a 24 V bank sagging to 23 V draws 3000 ÷ 0.9 ÷ 23 ≈ 145 A.

Inverter cable current by system voltage

Continuous DC input current for common inverter sizes at 90 % efficiency and nominal bank voltage. This is the number to type into the calculator above.

Inverter 12 V bank 24 V bank 48 V bank
1000 W 93 A 46 A 23 A
1500 W 139 A 69 A 35 A
2000 W 185 A 93 A 46 A
3000 W 278 A 139 A 69 A
5000 W 463 A 231 A 116 A

At 12 V, a 5000 W inverter needs over 460 A. That is beyond any single conductor in the NEC tables up to 500 kcmil and requires parallel conductors — the clearest possible argument for building larger systems at 48 V.

What actually fails on this circuit

The termination, not the cable. At 150 A a loose or under-crimped lug generates heat inside a connection you cannot inspect. Use a hydraulic crimper and listed lugs, and check the terminal temperature rating — most inverter and battery terminals are listed for 75 °C, which caps the ampacity column you may use under NEC 110.14(C) regardless of your conductor’s 90 °C jacket.

A smaller negative cable. The same current returns through it. The voltage drop figure above already accounts for both conductors.

Protection at the wrong end. The fuse belongs at the battery, as close to the positive terminal as practical, because the battery is the source of fault current.

Cable draped across a hot surface. The ampacity table assumes 30 °C ambient. An engine bay or a sealed battery box in summer is not 30 °C, and the calculator’s ambient field exists for exactly this.

Where this sits in the system

Sizing this cable gives you the current the battery-side overcurrent device has to be built around, and it is often the number that reveals whether your system voltage choice was right. If the answer here is uncomfortable, the fix is usually a higher bank voltage rather than more copper.

Frequently asked questions

How do I work out my inverter's DC input current?

Use the figure on the inverter datasheet if it lists one. If not, divide continuous AC output watts by the inverter's efficiency, then by the lowest battery voltage you expect under load. A 3000 W inverter at 90 % efficiency on a 24 V bank sagging to 23 V draws 3000 ÷ 0.9 ÷ 23, about 145 A. Using nominal voltage instead of the sagging voltage understates the current by around 10 %, which is enough to change the cable size.

Why 2 % voltage drop instead of 3 % on this cable?

Because the cost of the tighter target is almost nothing and the cost of missing it is real. The run is short, so going from 3 % to 2 % is typically one cable size. Drop on this circuit shows up as the inverter hitting low-voltage cutout while the battery still has usable capacity, and as reduced surge capability when a motor starts. Most inverter manufacturers specify 2 % or less in their installation manuals.

Should the fuse go at the battery end or the inverter end?

At the battery end, as close to the positive terminal as practical. The battery is the source of fault current, so protection there covers the entire length of cable. A fuse at the inverter end leaves the whole run unprotected against a short to the chassis or enclosure, which is precisely the fault a battery cable is most likely to see.

Can I use welding cable between my battery and inverter?

It is very common in RV, marine and van installations because it is flexible and cheap per amp, but most welding cable is not listed as a building wire and can be rejected in a permitted installation. For a code-compliant job use a listed battery cable or a conductor type such as RHW-2 or THW-2. Whatever you use, size it by the same rules — flexibility does not change resistance.

Do both the positive and negative cables need to be the same size?

Yes. The same current flows through both, and the voltage drop calculation already accounts for the round trip by doubling your one-way length. Using a smaller negative cable puts the whole circuit's return current through an undersized conductor and is a common cause of overheating at the negative busbar.

Does cable length really matter over such a short run?

More than anywhere else in the system, because the current is so high. At 200 A on a 12 V bank, every extra foot of one-way run costs roughly another 0.2 % of drop on 4/0 cable. Keeping the inverter within a few feet of the bank is usually cheaper than the cable needed to reach it from across a room.

Last reviewed 2026-08-19. Calculations reference NFPA 70 (NEC) 2023 where a code section applies. Sources, and what these tools deliberately do not model.